|
|
| Línea 1: |
Línea 1: |
| '''Multilateralismo''' es un termino en las [[relaciones internacionales]] que hace referencia al trabajo concertado de multiples paises sobre un tema dado. Multilateralismo fue definido por Miles Kahler como una "gobernanza internacional de los 'muchos'", y su principios central fue la "oposición de arreglos bilaterales discriminatorios que se cree se augmentó el apalancamiento de los poderosos sobre los debiles y por ende aumentaron el conflicto internacional", <ref>Kahler, Miles. “Multilateralism with Small and Large Numbers.” International Organization, 46, 3 (Verano 1992),681.</ref> | | '''Multilateralismo''' es un termino en las [[relaciones internacionales]] que hace referencia al trabajo concertado de multiples paises sobre un tema dado. Multilateralismo fue definido por Miles Kahler como una "gobernanza internacional de los 'muchos'", y su principios central fue la "oposición de arreglos bilaterales discriminatorios que se cree se augmentó el apalancamiento de los poderosos sobre los debiles y por ende aumentaron el conflicto internacional", <ref>Kahler, Miles. “Multilateralism with Small and Large Numbers.” International Organization, 46, 3 (Verano 1992),681.</ref> |
|
| |
|
| [[Organizaciones internacionales]], tales como las [[Naciones Unidas]] y la Organización Mundial de Comercio, son multilaterales por su naturaleza. Los proponentes principales del multilateralismo han sido los poderes medios tradicionalmente, tales como Canada, Australia, Suiza, y los Paises Bajos y Nórdicos. Los estados más grandes tipicamente actúan de manera [[unilateral]], mientras que los estados más pequeños tienen poco poder directo en las relaciones internacionales aparte de su participación en las Naciones Unidas (consolidando sus votos en un grupo con otros paises, por ejemplo). El multilateralismo puede involucrar a varios paises actuando juntos tal como es el caso en la ONU | | [[Organizaciones internacionales]], tales como las [[Naciones Unidas]] y la Organización Mundial de Comercio, son multilaterales por su naturaleza. Los proponentes principales del multilateralismo han sido los poderes medios tradicionalmente, tales como Canada, Australia, Suiza, y los Paises Bajos y Nórdicos. Los estados más grandes tipicamente actúan de manera [[unilateral]], mientras que los estados más pequeños tienen poco poder directo en las relaciones internacionales aparte de su participación en las Naciones Unidas (consolidando sus votos en un grupo con otros paises, por ejemplo). El multilateralismo puede involucrar a varios paises actuando juntos tal como es el caso en la ONU o pueden involucrar a alianzas regionales o militares, pactos o grupos tales como OTAN. |
|
| |
|
| [[International organizations]], such as the [[United Nations]] (UN) and the [[World Trade Organization]] are multilateral in nature. The main proponents of multilateralism have traditionally been the [[middle power]]s such as [[Canada]], [[Australia]], [[Switzerland]], the [[Benelux]] countries and the [[Nordic countries]]. Larger states often act [[Unilateralism|unilaterally]], while smaller ones may have little direct power in [[International relations|international affairs]] aside from participation in the United Nations (by consolidating their UN vote in a voting bloc with other nations, for example). Multilateralism may involve several nations acting together as in the UN or may involve regional or military alliances, pacts, or groupings such as [[NATO]].
| | ==Notas== |
| | |
| The [[conversion (logic)|converse]] of multilateralism is [[unilateralism]] in terms of [[political philosophy]].
| |
| | |
| == History == | |
| One modern instance of multilateralism occurred in the nineteenth century in [[Europe]] after the end of the [[Napoleonic Wars]], where the great powers met to redraw the map of Europe at the [[Congress of Vienna]]. The [[Concert of Europe]], as it became known, was a group of great and lesser powers that would meet to resolve issues peacefully. Conferences such as the [[Conference of Berlin]] in 1884 helped reduce power conflicts during this period, and the 19th century was one of Europe's most peaceful.{{Citation needed|date=February 2007}}
| |
| | |
| Industrial and colonial competition, combined with shifts in the balance of power after the creation - by diplomacy and conquest - of Germany by Prussia meant cracks were appearing in this system by the turn of the 20th century. The concert system was utterly destroyed by the [[World War I|First World War]]. After that conflict, world leaders created the [[League of Nations]] in an attempt to prevent a similar conflict. A number of international arms limitation treaties were also signed such as the [[Kellogg-Briand Pact]]. But the League proved insufficient to prevent Japan's conquests in Eastern Asia in the 1930s, escalating German aggression and, ultimately, the outbreak of the [[World War II|Second World War]] in 1939.{{Citation needed|date=February 2007}}
| |
| | |
| After the Second World War the victors, having drawn experience from the failure of the League of Nations, created the [[United Nations]] in 1945 with a structure intended to address the weaknesses of the previous body. Unlike the League, the UN had the active participation of the [[United States]] and the [[Soviet Union]], the world's two greatest contemporary powers. Along with the political institutions of the UN the post-war years also saw the development of other multilateral organizations such as the [[General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade]] (GATT) (now the [[World Trade Organization]]), the [[World Bank]] (so-called 'Bretton Woods' institutions) and the [[World Health Organization]]. The collective multilateral framework played an important role in maintaining world peace in the [[Cold War]].{{Citation needed|date=February 2007}} Moreover, United Nations [[peacekeeping|peacekeepers]] stationed around the world became one of the most visible symbols of multilateralism in recent decades.
| |
| | |
| Today there are several multilateral institutions of varying scope and subject matter, ranging from the [[International Telecommunications Union]] (ITU) to the [[World Intellectual Property Organization]] (WIPO) and [[Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons]] (OPCW). Many of these institutions were founded or are supported by the UN.
| |
| | |
| ===Challenges===
| |
| Compared to Unilateralism and Bilateralism where only the country itself decides on what to do or make decisions between two nations, Multilateralism is much more complex and challenging. It involves a number of nations which makes reaching an agreement difficult. In Multilateralism, there may be no consensus; each nations have to dedicate to some degree, to make the best outcome for all.
| |
| The multilateral system has encountered mounting challenges since the end of the Cold War. The United States has become increasingly dominant on the world stage in terms of military and economic power, which has led certain countries (such as Iran, China, and India) to question the United Nations' multilateral relevance. Concurrently, a perception developed among some internationalists, such as former UN Secretary General [[Kofi Anan]], that the United States is more inclined to act unilaterally in situations with international implications. This trend began<ref>{{cite book|last1=Hook|first1=Steven|last2=Spanier|first2=John|title=American Foreign Policy Since World War II|publisher=CQ Press|year=2007|page=305|chapter=Chapter 12: America Under Fire|isbn=1933116714|lastauthoramp=y}}</ref> when the U.S. Senate, in October 1999, refused to ratify the [[Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty]], which President [[Bill Clinton]] had signed in September 1996. Under President [[George W. Bush]] the United States rejected such multilateral agreements as the [[Kyoto Protocol]], the [[International Criminal Court]], the [[Ottawa Treaty]] banning anti-personnel land mines and a draft protocol to ensure compliance by States with the [[Biological Weapons Convention]]. Also under the Bush administration, the United States withdrew from the [[Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty]], which the Nixon administration and the Soviet Union had negotiated and jointly signed in 1972. In a direct challenge to the actions of the Bush administration, French president [[Jacques Chirac]] directly challenged the way of unilateralism: "In an open world, no one can live in isolation, no one can act alone in the name of all, and no one can accept the anarchy of a society without rules." He then proceeded to tout the advantages of multilateralism.
| |
| | |
| Global multilateralism is presently being challenged, particularly with respect to trade, by emerging regional arrangements such as the European Union or NAFTA, not in themselves incompatible with larger multilateral accords. More seriously, the original sponsor of post-war multilateralism in economic regimes, the United States, has turned to unliteral action and bilateral confrontation in trade and other negotiations as a result of frustration with the intricacies of consensus-building in a multilateral forum. As the most powerful member of the international community, the United States has the least to lose from abandoning multilateralism; the weakest nations have the most to lose, but the cost for all would be high.<ref name="Oxford Dictionary of Politics">{{cite web|title=Multilateralism|url=http://www.answers.com/topic/multilateralism "Multilateralism" in Oxford Dictionary of Politics}}</ref>
| |
| | |
| *Multilateralism is the key, for it ensures the participation of all in the management of world affairs. It is a guarantee of legitimacy and democracy, especially in matters regarding the use of force or laying down universal norms.
| |
| *Multilateralism works: in Monterrey and Johannesburg it has allowed us to overcome the clash of North and South and to set the scene for partnerships—with Africa notably—bearing promise for the future.
| |
| *Multilateralism is a concept for our time: for it alone allows us to apprehend contemporary problems globally and in all their complexity.<ref>Unilateralism or Multilateralism: U.N. Reform and the Future of the World, Wednesday, 1 October 2003</ref>
| |
| | |
| ==Notes==
| |
| {{reflist}} | | {{reflist}} |
| 6. ^ Jones, steve. retrieved fromhttp://usforeignpolicy.about.com/od/introtoforeignpolicy/a/What-Is-Multilateralism.htm
| |
|
| |
| ==See also==
| |
| *[[Hegemony]]
| |
| *[[Polarity in international relations]]
| |
| *[[New world order (politics)]]
| |
| *[[Bretton Woods system]]
| |
| *[[United Nations]]
| |
| *[[European Union]]
| |
| *[[North American Free Trade Agreement]]
| |
| *[[Open Government Partnership]]
| |
| *[[ASEAN]]
| |
| *[[East Asian Summit]]
| |
|
| |
|
| [[Category:International relations theory]] | | [[Category:Relaciones Internacionales]] |
| [[Category:Multilateral relations]]
| |
Multilateralismo es un termino en las relaciones internacionales que hace referencia al trabajo concertado de multiples paises sobre un tema dado. Multilateralismo fue definido por Miles Kahler como una "gobernanza internacional de los 'muchos'", y su principios central fue la "oposición de arreglos bilaterales discriminatorios que se cree se augmentó el apalancamiento de los poderosos sobre los debiles y por ende aumentaron el conflicto internacional", <ref>Kahler, Miles. “Multilateralism with Small and Large Numbers.” International Organization, 46, 3 (Verano 1992),681.</ref>
Organizaciones internacionales, tales como las Naciones Unidas y la Organización Mundial de Comercio, son multilaterales por su naturaleza. Los proponentes principales del multilateralismo han sido los poderes medios tradicionalmente, tales como Canada, Australia, Suiza, y los Paises Bajos y Nórdicos. Los estados más grandes tipicamente actúan de manera unilateral, mientras que los estados más pequeños tienen poco poder directo en las relaciones internacionales aparte de su participación en las Naciones Unidas (consolidando sus votos en un grupo con otros paises, por ejemplo). El multilateralismo puede involucrar a varios paises actuando juntos tal como es el caso en la ONU o pueden involucrar a alianzas regionales o militares, pactos o grupos tales como OTAN.
Notas
<references group=""></references>
